Fish Migration Tracked By Testing DNA In Seawater

2017-04-13T14:57:46+00:00 April 13, 2017|

DNAA bucket of seawater contains more than meets the eye — it’s chock-full of fish DNA. Scientists are now putting that DNA to good use to track fish migration with a new technique that involves a fraction of the effort and cost of previous methods.

(From Science Daily) — DNA strained from samples drawn weekly from New York’s East and Hudson Rivers revealed the presence or absence of several key fish species passing through the water on each test day. Published in PLOS ONE, the findings correlate with knowledge from migration studies conducted over many years with fishnet trawls.

“For the first time, we’ve successfully recorded a spring fish migration simply by conducting DNA tests on water samples,” says Mark Stoeckle, senior research associate in the Program for the Human Environment. Using this method to estimate the abundance and distribution of fish species could help scientists more easily understand the impact certain environmental factors, such as oyster farms or pollution, are having on local fish populations.

As they swim, fish leave traces of their DNA in the water, sloughed off their gelatinous outer coating or in excretions. Previous research had shown that relatively small volumes of freshwater and seawater have enough of this DNA, termed environmental DNA (eDNA), floating in them to detect dozens of fish species.

The researchers were able to identify 42 fish species by analyzing eDNA extracted from water samples, including most of the species known to be locally abundant or common, and only a few of the uncommon ones. The amount of eDNA from the various species identified roughly corresponded with data from net surveys.

“We didn’t find anything shocking about the fish migration — the seasonal movements and the species we found are known already,” says Stoeckle. That’s actually good news because it shows that the eDNA method is a good proxy to the traditional ones.

Read the full article here: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170412145219.htm